The REAL purpose is to hopefully get merle recognized as a pattern
option so they will not be registered as roans.
There have ALREADY been too many cases of people buying a merle thinking
it was roan.
If there is NO WAY to distinguish between the two SOON on AKC papers,
we are headed for some REAL problems.
Merle breeding is really in it's infancy.
We keep up the way we are, six years from now, we are going to be facing
a disaster and not only will ASC have the sables DQ'd, roan will
go right along with it because no one will legitimately know if a roan
is indeed a roan and not a merle.
Look what has happened to the sable- do we want that happening with
roan, too???
And AKC would not nullify all past merles in the first place.
If it were proven without a doubt that merle is from an outside gene,
ASC would make the decision what to do, not AKC.
If they decided to not acknowledge them as purebred and remember the
5 generation purity rule, any dogs registered that month would be
DQ'd and all future offspring wouldn't be eligible for registration.
How could they tell what is a merle in the first place when they're
all registered as roan anyway?
Send a rep to every person's home for on eyeball on every dog that
is registered as a roan?
LOL, not gonna happen.
They are safe.
My personal opinion is that
the sables got thrown out..not because of the color..but a personal vendetta
against a well-know sable breeder.
Now guess what she is breeding now? Right! Very nice roans. How "convenient"
it would be to suddenly disallow the roans (personal vendetta here again)
because of an argument that people can't tell the difference between
them and merles!!! Catch my drift? ASC IMO, isn't going to do a damn thing
about this issue because it would be "killing 2 birds" with one stone.
So yes, we DO need to work at getting AKC to register merles as merles,
whether we like them, or approve of them or not.
You have to remember the
mindset of ASC. To them, there are only 4 acceptable colors- buff, black,
r/w and b/w. If browns came to the mainstream during the age of the internet,
I bet you they'd have had a real hard time, too, not that they didn't.
It's an "old school" board and they don't like change. Some of the old-timer's
don't even like partis, lol.
I also think they don't even want to acknowledge the existence of merles,
legit or not, doesn't matter to them.
The "Pandora's Box" opened with the arrival of the sudden boom in merle
breeding, not whether ASC can or even should add the color.
Now, they have a REAL good excuse to dismiss roan and sable. If you
can't tell a merle from a roan or sable, how do you know they ALL aren't??
See the danger here and how easy it would be for them to slide that right
on past everyone?
I say we MAKE them acknowledge the difference before it's too
late and NOTHING can be done but idly sit and wait for them to vote on
the sable issue again, only this time it will be the sable and roan issue,
I'm afraid.

Please understand this is
not a witch hunt, it's a fact finding mission, all opinions are welcome
and with discussion comes knowledge,
I have had sables since 79, so I have been thru the wars! and I believe
this is a free country, people have the right to do as their conscience
dictates, I'm very proud of my sables and will defend them until I'm no
longer here to do it.
But Merle is a Health risk, and we don't need more problems in our
breed, IF I had seen 1 , even 1 health trait that the sable brought into
the gene pool I would have stopped breeding them in an instant!
It is our fear that people who do not know what they are, and doesn't
have a clue about the genetics will be pairing them up and we will have
disasters.
I have seen this in a litter if shelties here in our local pound
they were dropped off because the whole litter has different degrees of
blindness hearing loss or both , it just broke my heart they were so sweet
but ours is not a no kill shelter,! do you think they will be adopted!

Ok, so saying your theory is
correct and this woman did in fact bring in a different breed into the
cocker fold, with it's beauty and problems all in one package...how many
years ago has this been? Also how many generations of purebred cockers
brought back into the mix?
Our present day cockers came to be because of other dogs bred into their
pedigrees years ago...and when I say years, am talking maybe 100 or more.
If I am not mistaken a spaniel who is now extinct was part of this too..
Doesn't that make this merle gene then after so many generations something
that has become part of the dog no matter how it was introduced?
Not saying it wasn't a mutation..just giving both sides of this issue
the benefit of the doubt..
My thoughts are ok, we figured out the (maybe) how and why...so now
since it is here, how do we teach John Q. Public the dangers and responsibilities
of these dogs?
Wouldn't it be better to try to work with all these "unique" cocker
breeders, not putting them down, but having them agree to spay/neuter any
dogs they sell...thereby keeping those who don't have a clue on genetics
or the problem from breeding what they get with those potential problems?
Learning is one of the best things we humans do..and if we approach
people with our concerns, am hoping that anyone who really cares would
listen.

I'm surprised at all the
controversy surrounding this color.
Well, here goes. I own a merle and this is
what I can tell you about him. His coat is undesirable in that
it is coarse and brittle. He has recurring skin problems (open sores) and
runny eyes and is contstantly being treated with antibiotics. He
has produced some beautiful puppies early on but occassionally some of
his offspring will end up with horriffic bites. I was told I was
purchasing a ROAN but the breeder I bought him from did not know the difference
between merle and roan. I also traced his pedigree back to
a puppy mill in missouri. Having said all that, please don't
persecute me because what I can also tell you is that he is one of THE
sweetest cockers I have ever encountered. It's quite heartbreaking.
He is being neutered monday.

|